Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

• Mike Lane looks like an idiot February 21, 2007 9:50 am

  

  Lemming-face Mike Lane insulted America’s intelligence by trying to create the visual of troops in the field being cutoff logisticly because the funding of the impending military appropriations bill might be voted down
  He insults our military which are well-trained in ordered withdrawals
  Mike might look to the British troops as they stand down–to see how it is done–as Tony Blair sees the wisdom that Mike doesn’t–in leaving the land of diminishing returns

• Robt February 16, 2007 2:43 pm

  

  Oh yeah,
  Does Mike still feel the same now that the Libby trial has provided damaging insight to this Administrations demeanor and willful disgust for the American system that they graced themselves as above our laws (just as God tells Jerry Falwell he is)?
  Why do Repoblicans place “Their” Religion above our Constitution?
  Example; Faith based initiative…………..

• Robt February 16, 2007 2:33 pm

  

  Mark,
  Questions for you and Mike;
  -When the Repubs controlled, they stood on “principal” of the UP OR DOWN VOTE. They threatened to use the nuclear option to hinder the minority voice of this country.
  Question-Do the Repubs regret not detonating the
  nuclear option for the up or down vote
  when they had the majority?
  -If the Repubs are so principaled and
  so strongly believing in the “up or
  down vote”. Why are they now flip/
  flopping on their principals now that
  their in the majority?
  -If the Dems threatened the
  nuclear option rules change. Would
  the Repubs now reverse their principals
  and resist? If so, Why?
  -When will the Repubs accept their place
  as the minority? (It was the repubs
  that often rudely espoused the
  overbearing dictatory partisanship
  as a majority).
  -What has the Republicans learned from
  their sad tenor that was imposed with
  detrement on this country?
  -Why are the Repubs so afraid to debate
  the Iraq occupation?
  -Does Mike think that the American
  people had a right to hear such debate
  before the war and and certainly do
  deserve to hear it now from our
  “representatives” NOT our ruling class?
  (Please leave out the rhetoric of how
  such debate hurts the troops and
  aids the enemy, for myself a veteran
  I know this not to be true).
  -Does Mike see his Repub party in
  Government as not providing the
  transparency that “WE the People ”
  Demand? Does he see any provlems
  with secretive governments?
  If you have time to hit on these Queastions or at least in this line of debate with Mike. I would be so much amused by hearing the Repub side with your counter, of course Mark.
  Thanks

• End run around neo-con escalation February 16, 2007 9:23 am

  

  I love how Rep. Murtha is proposing a “back-door” drawdown of troops by instituting rules of combat service–including a mandatory one-year stand-down from combat zones and limits on the amount of mandatory combat tours
  He’s a true grunt who knows how to deal with the on-going injustice pragmatically
  With Murtha’s rules–combat troop levels will subside with no fuss or muss–and then we will probably see the neo-cons knee-jerk with a call for the draft in some form